Coronavirus Outbreak - Will China be isolated?

China is a nation whose core dynamic is based on international trade. Under pressure from the United States, the dangerous Coronavirus would inevitably cripple that trade at best. China fears massive trade restrictions and embargoes. The Russians already screening China’s northern border

outbreak-corona-virus-china
On their way to quarantine: People from Wuhan / dpa

Autoreninfo

George Friedman ist einer der bekanntesten geopolitischen Analysten in den Vereinigten Staaten. Der 67 Jahre alte Politologe leitet die von ihm gegründete  Denkfabrik Geopolitical Futures und ist Autor zahlreicher Bücher. Zuletzt erschien „Flashpoints – Pulverfass Europa“ im Plassen-Verlag.

So erreichen Sie George Friedman:

 GF

Diese englischsprachige Kolumne erscheint regelmäßig auf cicero.de in Kooperation mit der Denkfabrik Geopolitical Futures.

Geopolitics is a fairly slow-moving process that unfolds in predictable ways. This is usually the case. There are then moments when a wild card enters the system from the outside, unpredictable yet significant. At the moment, we can’t tell if the new coronavirus is such an event. We don’t know exactly how it is transmitted, how lethal it is, whether it causes long-term illness and so on. We know it has broken out in a Chinese city, Wuhan; that the Chinese government regards it as serious enough to impose significant controls on movement in and out of Wuhan; and that a small number of cases in China, relative to the population, and a smaller number of cases outside of China have been reported. For this we depend on media reports, since our own knowledge of viral medicine is limited.

Geopolitically, communicable disease ranges from the common cold to the Black Death. The former is ever-present but of little consequence; the latter massively disrupted European society and, in some cases, shifted the regional balance of power. There is a trigger point between these two diseases where the political system erects disruptions in everyday life and commerce designed to limit the effect of the disease. To some extent these actions are effective, and to some extent they can be sufficiently disruptive to cause economic problems. We are at the moment teetering between these points, with the consequence of the disease and the consequence of protecting against the disease uncertain.

China's Dependency on Exports

The major threat would appear to be travelers carrying the virus. The United States has banned travel to the U.S. for foreigners who have traveled to infected regions, while U.S. citizens may return but are quarantined for two weeks. Major U.S. airlines are starting the process of suspending all flights to and from China, but Chinese airlines and U.S. cargo carriers are still flying to the U.S. Other countries like Russia have also imposed travel bans. The U.S. government has imposed very limited barriers, through which the disease is likely to pass. Most important, maritime shipments to and from China have not been significantly disrupted. This is vital, because if they were to be suspended, the situation would transform from a problem to a crisis.

China is dependent on exports to maintain its economy. About 20 percent of its gross domestic product derives from exports, and its single largest customer is the United States, despite the trade dispute. Assume for the moment that the new coronavirus were closer to the bubonic plague than the common cold, or assume that the panic that arises from the fear of the unknown compelled the governments of multiple advanced countries to place China under quarantine. It is an unlikely but far from impossible outcome.

The Chinese Government is under intense Pressure

The Chinese government has been under intense pressure in three ways. First, the crackdown on Xinjiang province generated a massive negative response from Europe and the United States. Alongside that, the United States imposed significant tariffs on China. The contraction in exports hit a financial system that the Beijing government was already struggling to stabilize. This led to fear among Chinese authorities of unrest over economic and financial issues. The result was increasing security, from recognition technology to intrusion into the internet and periodic arrests of those considered dissidents. Economic insecurity led to increased security. This in turn led to Hong Kong. The Hong Kong riots were triggered by a bill that authorized China to extradite Hong Kong residents. This was a desire Beijing did not have before. But as the situation intensified, the desire to assure stability in Hong Kong increased. With the bill, some in Hong Kong recognized that extradition could be carried out for things legal in Hong Kong and could lead to extreme sentences. It represented an existential threat to many in Hong Kong, and the results were transmitted around the world.

A chief responsibility of the Chinese president is to manage relations with its most important customer, the United States. China has deflected American demands to open its markets and not manipulate its currency since the George W. Bush administration. It was expected that President Xi Jinping could continue this process. He failed to manage U.S. President Donald Trump, and the result was that an exporting nation faced a challenge from a consuming nation. To put it more simply, there is a rule in business that you should never have a fight with your best customer. Xi violated this rule by winding up in a tariff fight with the United States.

No Evidence of a Fight in the Central Committee

There is no evidence – but then, there wouldn’t be – of a fight in the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party over Xi’s stewardship. The Central Committee is packed with Xi supporters, of course, but a situation like what has developed must cause concern and generate ambitions. The idea that the Central Committee was content with the financial situation, trade war, Hong Kong and Xinjiang is to me the least likely situation.

Now, to the coronavirus. Assume that the fears that are being expressed do not turn out to be exaggerated. Assume that in response to this, massive trade restrictions and embargoes were imposed on China and that freighters were not permitted to dock in Long Beach or Rotterdam, nor would they be permitted in Shanghai. With the Russians already screening China’s northern border, China would be isolated.

Tension within China might explode

China is a nation whose core dynamic is based on international trade. Under pressure from the United States, a dangerous virus would inevitably cripple that trade at best. At this point, the Chinese government, like any government, would be blamed for what went wrong, and it would be blamed for mismanaging the virus and failing to understand the economic consequences. From here you can play out the game.

The reason for this exercise is to point out that the coronavirus is neither a geopolitical nor a political event. Diseases emerge with some frequency. But given the Chinese dynamic and China’s current condition, the virus could readily evolve into a geopolitical and political event, in which tension within China might explode, with the coronavirus the last straw and China’s international position transformed.

A fundamental Transformation of the international System

To emphasize, I have no idea what „2019-nCoV“ is or what it will do, but judging from what is being said about it and the level of anxiety, I will assume for the sake of argument that it is more dangerous than not. Then, given the evolution of the past year or two, and given the fear that always follows new, deadly diseases, we could see a fundamental transformation of the international system.

Not all events are geopolitical. They do not arise out of relations between nations. But events that are unconnected to geopolitics can connect themselves to the system and disrupt it. This is meant as an exercise in geopolitical theory. It is not insignificant in the case of China, which has had a difficult period and doesn’t need to be quarantined by the world.

Brigitte Simon | Di, 4. Februar 2020 - 17:22

"I feel me isolated" durch den erneut in englischer Sprache gehaltenen Artikels.
Gott sei Dank kann ich in der Volkshochschule einen englischen Crashkurs absolvieren. Mein bißchen Latein ist nicht mehr aktuell, obwohl ein Buch für modernes Latein bei Hugendubel käuflich erstanden werden kann. Doch damit bin ich noch mehr hinter dem Mond.
Please help me!!! Thank you, thank you very much!

How can you "isolate" a country which is as important as China these days? In times of globalisation, closed borders won't help, even less so if epedemics are spreading out at a global scale. Connections to and with China are manifold, and not only Chinese citizens are affected, but also those from other countries, Europeans self-evidently included, who had been working there and are currently being evacuated. As concerns the political consequences, it is certainly far too early to realistically estimate the possible impact. Furthermore, it seems rather unlikely that the epidemy puts the political system and the Chinese government at risk. Such fallout would only happen if the government and the ruling party made some grave mistakes in their effort to fight the Coronavirus.

P.S. Thank you much, dear Cicero people, for this very interesting text in English. Mr Friedman's texts are always great pleasure to read!

that you are thrilled by China and its political system, in particular the leading role of the communist party? However, if my impression is true than I am a bit confused about that what you write about closed borders. In my view a communist country is inseparably combined with closed borders.

..is completely wrong, read again, and stop trying to imply things you simply invent. On a more serious note: You should not underestimate the importance of China's standing in the political world. Which, by the way, is a strong argument in favour of an integrated Europe, because little tiny Germany would only serve as a toomfool in the competition with China, Russia or Trump' USA.
And again, closed borders in such a context may be useful to conform to the simplified thinking of AfD- oder Pegidamembers, but are basically nonsensical.

Marianne Bernstein | Di, 4. Februar 2020 - 19:26

You just sounds like somebody planted the virus to take advantage of. I can ensure you that people China already think that!
If you hope that this could lead to a regime change you underestimate how proud Chinese people are. They are not following western advice, they know what the troops of the Eight-Nation Alliance did in 1900.

what they want, why bother with proof? Everyone is entitled to his/her own truth nwadays! The big conspiracy theory, revealing that a dangerius virus was developped by humans, doubtlessly in some military laboratory..or elsewhere? Someone had to be the first one in this forum with such "conclusion". Yet there remains the question who that was...As long as we have someone to blame, we don"t feel helpless and the sun keeps shining....

Gisela Fimiani | Mi, 5. Februar 2020 - 09:36

Thanks, for letting us know that the future is hard to predict. It becomes unpredictable when „a wild card“ comes into play.....

Ihr Kommentar zu diesem Artikel

Der Inhalt dieses Feldes wird nicht öffentlich zugänglich angezeigt.

Liebe Leserinnen und Leser,
wir freuen uns über jeden Kommentar und wünschen uns eine konstruktive Debatte. Beleidigende, unsachliche oder obszöne Beiträge werden deshalb gelöscht. Auch anonyme Kommentare werden bei uns nicht veröffentlicht. Wir bitten deshalb um Angabe des vollen Namens. Darüber hinaus behalten wir uns eine Auswahl der Kommentare auf unserer Seite vor. Um die Freischaltung kümmert sich die kleine Onlineredaktion von Montag bis Freitag von 9 bis 18 Uhr. Am Wochenende werden Forumsbeiträge nur eingeschränkt veröffentlicht. Nach zwei Tagen wird die Debatte geschlossen. Wir danken für Ihr Verständnis.